Local council · Hyndburn

St Oswald's

1 seat contested on Thursday 7 May 2026. 3 candidates from 3 parties.

Confidence in the forecast: High · Official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

Ward locator for St Oswald's; neighbouring wards shaded by Reform UK vote-share difference vs this ward.

Neighbours shaded by Reform UK share vs this ward, red = higher, blue = lower.

Predicted vote share

What the model expects

Conservative
44.2%
Reform UK
31.2%
Labour
24.6%

Predictions are point estimates: the model's best guess, not a guarantee. The "How this prediction was made" section below lists every step that shaped this forecast.

How accurate was the model here?

Our 7 May 2026 forecast for St Oswald's

✗ Winner missed , predicted Conservative, actual Reform UK. Major-party MAE: 4.70pp across the parties below.
PartyPredictedActualGap
Reform UK 37.4% 44.4% -7.1pp
Labour 20.7% 15.4% +5.3pp
Conservative 42.0% 40.2% +1.8pp

Positive gap = we predicted that party would win more share than they did. See the full Hyndburn accuracy summary or the national audit.

Recent contests

What happened last time

DateTypeWinnerTop shareSource
2024-05-02 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 53.4% declaration
2023-05-04 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 51.5% declaration
2022-05-05 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 31.5% declaration
2021-05-06 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 50.8% declaration
2019-05-02 Cycle Labour Party 40.2% declaration

Candidates 2026

Parties on the ballot

View the official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

How this area looks demographically

Figures are for Hyndburn as a whole. The same local-authority figures are used for every ward in the council, finer ward-level demographics will land in a future release.

How this prediction was made
  1. Baseline . Most recent borough result (2024-05-02)
  2. BES MRP Prior . Baseline blended with BES Wave 1-30 north_west prior (weight 15%, n=3934 regional respondents)
  3. National Swing (STM) . Strong Transition Model: multiplicative bounded swing, dampened by 0.1 for local
  4. Demographics . 1 demographic factor(s) applied
  5. Incumbency . No current holder data available
  6. New Party Entry . Reform UK has existing baseline, no proxy needed
  7. Normalise . All shares scaled to sum to 100%
  8. Restrict to ballot . Removed 5 party/parties not standing in 2026 (Green Party 2.9pp, Liberal Democrats 1.8pp, SNP 0.1pp, Plaid Cymru 0.0pp, Other 0.0pp). Their share redistributed pro-rata.
  9. 2025 county-cycle anchor . Blended (weight 0.1) toward May 2025 results for lancashire (82 divisions, 329,832 votes), adjusted by national swing since May 2025. This corrects the model's tendency to under-weight Reform's 2025 county breakthroughs in 2-tier districts.
  10. National-share calibration . Aggregate-predicted vs national-polled mismatch corrected at strength 0.65. Multipliers — Labour ×0.82, Conservative ×1.00, Reform UK ×1.15, Liberal Democrats ×0.96, Green Party ×1.12, SNP ×1.00, Plaid Cymru ×1.00.

Read the full local-elections methodology →

← Back to Hyndburn