Local council · Birmingham

Kingstanding

2 seats contested on Thursday 7 May 2026. 12 candidates from 6 parties.

Confidence in the forecast: High · Official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

Ward locator for Kingstanding; neighbouring wards shaded by Reform UK vote-share difference vs this ward.

Neighbours shaded by Reform UK share vs this ward, red = higher, blue = lower.

Predicted vote share

What the model expects

Conservative
35.2%
Labour
29.2%
Reform UK
20.7%
Green Party
7.2%
Lib Dem
5.7%
Independent
2.0%

Predictions are point estimates: the model's best guess, not a guarantee. The "How this prediction was made" section below lists every step that shaped this forecast.

How accurate was the model here?

Our 7 May 2026 forecast for Kingstanding

✗ Winner missed , predicted Conservative, actual Reform UK. Major-party MAE: 7.39pp across the parties below.
PartyPredictedActualGap
Reform UK 29.2% 41.4% -12.2pp
Labour 24.2% 16.3% +7.9pp
Conservative 32.6% 22.9% +9.7pp

Positive gap = we predicted that party would win more share than they did. See the full Birmingham accuracy summary or the national audit.

Recent contests

What happened last time

DateTypeWinnerTop shareSource
2024-05-30 By-election Conservative and Unionist Party 49.7% declaration
2022-05-05 Cycle Labour Party 24.3% declaration
2018-05-03 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 27.1% declaration
2016-05-05 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 43.5% declaration

Candidates 2026

Parties on the ballot

View the official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

How this area looks demographically

Figures are for Birmingham as a whole. The same local-authority figures are used for every ward in the council, finer ward-level demographics will land in a future release.

How this prediction was made
  1. Baseline . Most recent borough result (2024-05-30)
  2. BES MRP Prior . Baseline blended with BES Wave 1-30 west_midlands prior (weight 15%, n=3013 regional respondents)
  3. National Swing (STM) . Strong Transition Model: multiplicative bounded swing, dampened by 0.1 for local
  4. Demographics . 2 demographic factor(s) applied
  5. Incumbency . No current holder data available
  6. New Party Entry . Reform UK estimated at 4.5% from GE/LCC proxy + swing
  7. Normalise . All shares scaled to sum to 100%
  8. Restrict to ballot . Removed 5 party/parties not standing in 2026 (Workers Party 2.3pp, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 1.0pp, SNP 0.1pp, Plaid Cymru 0.0pp, Other 0.0pp). Their share redistributed pro-rata.
  9. 2025 county-cycle anchor . No 2025 reference available for this council's parent area. Stage 1 uses national polling only.
  10. Reform realignment uplift (no-anchor councils) . No 2025 parent-county anchor available; demographic-borrow rule applied. Asian 32.0% → base target 23.2% × regional multiplier 0.75 = 17.4%. Reform 5.2% → 17.4% (lift +12.2pp). Other parties scaled pro-rata. Calibration source: Burnley 2026 ward-level Asian%↔Reform% relationship (the 2-tier district that did receive the LCC 2025 anchor).
  11. National-share calibration . Aggregate-predicted vs national-polled mismatch corrected at strength 0.65. Multipliers — Labour ×0.82, Conservative ×1.00, Reform UK ×1.15, Liberal Democrats ×0.96, Green Party ×1.12, SNP ×1.00, Plaid Cymru ×1.00.

Read the full local-elections methodology →

← Back to Birmingham