Local council · Plymouth

Plympton St Mary

1 seat contested on Thursday 7 May 2026. 6 candidates from 6 parties.

Confidence in the forecast: High · Official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

Ward locator for Plympton St Mary; neighbouring wards shaded by Reform UK vote-share difference vs this ward.

Neighbours shaded by Reform UK share vs this ward, red = higher, blue = lower.

Predicted vote share

What the model expects

Reform UK
34.4%
Conservative
21.2%
Independent
21.1%
Labour
10.9%
Lib Dem
7.6%
Green Party
4.6%

Predictions are point estimates: the model's best guess, not a guarantee. The "How this prediction was made" section below lists every step that shaped this forecast.

How accurate was the model here?

Our 7 May 2026 forecast for Plympton St Mary

✓ Winner called correctly , predicted Reform UK, actual Reform UK. Major-party MAE: 4.12pp across the parties below.
PartyPredictedActualGap
Reform UK 35.1% 32.8% +2.3pp
Labour 9.6% 7.7% +1.9pp
Conservative 22.5% 31.3% -8.8pp

Positive gap = we predicted that party would win more share than they did. See the full Plymouth accuracy summary or the national audit.

Recent contests

What happened last time

DateTypeWinnerTop shareSource
2024-05-02 Cycle Independent 35.2% declaration
2023-05-04 Cycle Independent 50.7% declaration
2022-05-05 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 63.0% declaration
2021-05-06 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 73.7% declaration
2019-05-02 Cycle Conservative and Unionist Party 72.6% declaration

Candidates 2026

Parties on the ballot

View the official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

How this area looks demographically

Figures are for Plymouth as a whole. The same local-authority figures are used for every ward in the council, finer ward-level demographics will land in a future release.

How this prediction was made
  1. Baseline . Most recent borough result (2024-05-02)
  2. BES MRP Prior . Baseline blended with BES Wave 1-30 south_west prior (weight 15%, n=3857 regional respondents)
  3. National Swing (STM) . Strong Transition Model: multiplicative bounded swing, dampened by 0.1 for local
  4. Demographics . 2 demographic factor(s) applied
  5. Incumbency . No current holder data available
  6. New Party Entry . Reform UK has existing baseline, no proxy needed
  7. Normalise . All shares scaled to sum to 100%
  8. Restrict to ballot . Removed 4 party/parties not standing in 2026 (Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 0.6pp, SNP 0.0pp, Plaid Cymru 0.0pp, Other 0.0pp). Their share redistributed pro-rata.
  9. 2025 county-cycle anchor . No 2025 reference available for this council's parent area. Stage 1 uses national polling only.
  10. Reform realignment uplift (no-anchor councils) . No 2025 parent-county anchor available; demographic-borrow rule applied. Asian 2.5% → base target 36.0% × regional multiplier 0.85 = 30.6%. Reform 14.5% → 30.6% (lift +16.1pp). Other parties scaled pro-rata. Calibration source: Burnley 2026 ward-level Asian%↔Reform% relationship (the 2-tier district that did receive the LCC 2025 anchor).
  11. National-share calibration . Aggregate-predicted vs national-polled mismatch corrected at strength 0.65. Multipliers — Labour ×0.82, Conservative ×1.00, Reform UK ×1.15, Liberal Democrats ×0.96, Green Party ×1.12, SNP ×1.00, Plaid Cymru ×1.00.

Read the full local-elections methodology →

← Back to Plymouth