Local council · St. Helens

West Park

3 seats contested on Thursday 7 May 2026. 10 candidates from 4 parties.

Confidence in the forecast: High · Official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

Ward locator for West Park; neighbouring wards shaded by Reform UK vote-share difference vs this ward.

Neighbours shaded by Reform UK share vs this ward, red = higher, blue = lower.

Predicted vote share

What the model expects

Labour
39.3%
Reform UK
32.3%
Conservative
23.5%
Green Party
4.9%

Predictions are point estimates: the model's best guess, not a guarantee. The "How this prediction was made" section below lists every step that shaped this forecast.

How accurate was the model here?

Our 7 May 2026 forecast for West Park

✗ Winner missed , predicted Labour, actual Reform UK. Major-party MAE: 11.22pp across the parties below.
PartyPredictedActualGap
Reform UK 33.9% 43.2% -9.3pp
Labour 36.8% 35.6% +1.3pp
Conservative 23.8% 2.6% +21.2pp

Positive gap = we predicted that party would win more share than they did. See the full St. Helens accuracy summary or the national audit.

Recent contests

What happened last time

DateTypeWinnerTop shareSource
2022-05-05 Cycle Labour Party 31.3% declaration
2021-05-06 Cycle Labour Party 53.8% declaration
2019-05-02 Cycle Labour Party 54.0% declaration
2018-05-03 Cycle Labour Party 61.8% declaration
2016-05-05 Cycle Labour Party 36.6% declaration

Candidates 2026

Parties on the ballot

View the official Statement of Persons Nominated (PDF)

How this area looks demographically

Figures are for St Helens as a whole. The same local-authority figures are used for every ward in the council, finer ward-level demographics will land in a future release.

How this prediction was made
  1. Baseline . Most recent borough result (2022-05-05)
  2. BES MRP Prior . Baseline blended with BES Wave 1-30 north_west prior (weight 15%, n=3934 regional respondents)
  3. National Swing (STM) . Strong Transition Model: multiplicative bounded swing, dampened by 0.1 for local
  4. Demographics . 2 demographic factor(s) applied
  5. Incumbency . No current holder data available
  6. New Party Entry . Reform UK estimated at 6.3% from GE/LCC proxy + swing
  7. Normalise . All shares scaled to sum to 100%
  8. Restrict to ballot . Removed 4 party/parties not standing in 2026 (Liberal Democrats 3.2pp, SNP 0.1pp, Plaid Cymru 0.0pp, Other 0.0pp). Their share redistributed pro-rata.
  9. 2025 county-cycle anchor . No 2025 reference available for this council's parent area. Stage 1 uses national polling only.
  10. Reform realignment uplift (no-anchor councils) . No 2025 parent-county anchor available; demographic-borrow rule applied. Asian 1.5% → base target 36.0% × regional multiplier 0.75 = 27.0%. Reform 15.5% → 27.0% (lift +11.5pp). Other parties scaled pro-rata. Calibration source: Burnley 2026 ward-level Asian%↔Reform% relationship (the 2-tier district that did receive the LCC 2025 anchor).
  11. National-share calibration . Aggregate-predicted vs national-polled mismatch corrected at strength 0.65. Multipliers — Labour ×0.82, Conservative ×1.00, Reform UK ×1.15, Liberal Democrats ×0.96, Green Party ×1.12, SNP ×1.00, Plaid Cymru ×1.00.

Read the full local-elections methodology →

← Back to St. Helens